Considering referee decisions

I need to respond to a Chinese sentence that's talking about a referee's wrong decision in an Italian Serie D game. It seems the user might be looking for news, clarification, or a deeper discussion. They didn't ask a specific question, so I could suggest options like a summary or analysis of the rules. I could explain why a goal from the side netting shouldn't count and discuss the implications of VAR not being available in Serie D. I’ll provide a brief analysis on how goals are validated too.Explaining goal decision rules

According to the Laws of the Game, once play restarts after a kick-off, a referee can't change a goal decision, except for mistaken identity or violence. I need to reference Law 10 and Law 5, which outline that decisions can only be changed before play has resumed. If there's a side-net entry, the net should be checked beforehand. I could mention the 2013 "phantom goal" incident as an example. It might be helpful to suggest next steps, like drafting a post or fact-checking this information.Clarifying goal validity rules

I need to explain that according to the IFAB Laws of the Game, particularly Law 10, a goal counts only if the ball fully crosses the goal line between the posts and under the crossbar. If it goes through the side net, it hasn’t actually crossed between the posts, making it a wrong decision. I could also mention how assistant referees signal by not running to the halfway line and the importance of pre-match net checks and awareness, especially in Serie D, where there’s no VAR.Addressing rare goal scenarios

I need to cover some rare cases where a ball might enter through the side netting. Sometimes this happens due to a tear in the net, or the ball can hit a support and bounce out. If it entered the side net from outside, it doesn't count as a goal. I should suggest that if the ball went out over the goal line without touching a defender, it would restart with a goal kick. If it went in through a hole, a dropped ball restart is necessary.